- Task Graph
- States
- Duplicates
Experiences Schedule
Apparently the design concerns try solved together with execution is actually lower than feedback. Should the RFC getting booked to own conversation during the TechCom?
Obviously the proper execution inquiries was fixed in addition to implementation is actually below comment. Should the RFC getting booked to own discussion in the TechCom?
18+ discuter
- This new offer about activity dysfunction is pretty not the same as exactly what could have been accompanied. Because of it to progress since the an RFC, the task malfunction should be up-to-date in order to echo what we should are generally looking at.
- We don’t determine if that is suggested purely due to the fact a 3rd people element, and implementation towards the WMF expertise. When it is for only third people, it might not even you desire a keen RFC, and may also maybe performed given that an expansion as well. If it is for WMF manufacturing, we will have to look carefully to your effects to own caching and you will performance.
Seemingly the form concerns is solved therefore the implementation are below feedback. If the RFC become planned to have dialogue from the TechCom?
18+ discuter
- The latest proposal regarding activity malfunction is pretty distinctive from just what might have been observed. For this to advance because the an enthusiastic RFC, work breakdown has to be updated so you can reflect that which we are usually considering.
- We do not determine if this is recommended strictly since the a 3rd people ability, or even for implementation into WMF systems. In case it is just for third parties, it might not even you prefer an enthusiastic RFC, and may also maybe be performed once the an expansion also. If it is for WMF manufacturing, we will see to seem carefully for the implications to own caching and you will abilities.
W.r.t. #step one – The proper execution provides indeed advanced even as we performs which have on the section anchor much more practical and user friendly. We could upgrade the latest malfunction of RFC. #dos – Do “implementation to your WMF solutions” imply while making that it element of MediaWiki key application? I believe it’s long been this new assumption, for this reason it offers experienced of many iterations from framework, i18n and you will perf upgrade 🙂 Could WMF nearest and dearest chime into prove it is however the case?
#2 – Does “deployment on WMF solutions” indicate 
while making this section of MediaWiki key app? I believe it’s long been the latest expectation, for this reason it has got experienced of a lot iterations out of construction, i18n and you can perf update 🙂 You are going to WMF relatives chime into prove this is however the latest circumstances?
It indicates providing it on the at the very least a number of the WMF sites. Be it section of center or an extension is not thus associated. The first RFC could have been registered toward thought of having that it allowed into Wikipedia and you can loved ones, however, I would ike to features specific keyword on that in the related WMF someone.
18+ discuter
- Do not determine if this can be suggested strictly once the a third cluster element, or for implementation towards WMF possibilities. In case it is for third people, may possibly not also need an RFC, and will perhaps be done because an extension too. If it is to own WMF production, we will have to seem very closely to your ramifications for caching and abilities.
Giving a scientific direction: the modern implementation of this particular feature depends on some transform so you’re able to the latest Parser production therefore the Facial skin template, which wanted alter toward core. To help you to do a comparable when you look at the an extension, there however has to be particular change in the brand new center – especially to own anchor thinking to the SkinEditSectionLinks link (meaning that all of the changes but the actual including of the ‘share’ hook will have to go into the core in any event). I believe therefore it will make a whole lot more feel for this once the a key alter. It’s still configurable courtesy $wgEnableSectionHeaderShare around the world, that is regarding by default. If worth try false, no additional logic or JavaScript/CSS tips is actually invoked of the function.