Advocates of the unidimensional strategy matter the necessity for this type out-of group into the factor that it’s perhaps not particular whether they offer a far greater comprehension of human habits and that they normally obscure the picture ( Lukaszewski, 2010 22. Lukaszewski , W . ( 2010 ). Udreka zycia. [torment away from lives] . Sopot : Smak slowa . ). In their opinion, the research of its consequences on the informal peoples life is significantly more important than identifying the sourced elements of the newest FOPD, like in the research based on the terror management principle (Solomon, Greenberg, & Pyszczynski, 2015). For this reason, it may be figured no matter what precisely we define the thing of your FOPD, several central circumstances will still be a comparable: the fact we experience anxiety plus the simple fact that for the all of the times they questions death-the fresh new fragility away from people lifetime. In comparison, Yalom (2008b) thinks one dying anxiety try a variety of collection of, essentially certain, concerns, around which the main concern is driving a car from private annihilation-worries regarding ceasing to thrive. Within evaluate, it is legitimate to help you are convinced that the 2 techniques (unidimensional and you will multidimensional) don’t prohibit each other but make it a far greater comprehension of various other servings from people lifetime in which the FOPD functions a keen important means. For the caffmos reddit structure of your own FOPD, possible separate one another a standard dimensions and you will a quantity of specific models making it up; the fresh aspects which should be the focus decided from the objectives plus the precision of your own tools made use of.
A comparison of one’s for you personally classifications implies, firstly, any particular one types of FOPD (elizabeth
grams., anxiety about lifetime after dying, concern about the whole process of passing away otherwise fear of the body immediately following demise) exist independently of adopted identity traditional, and you may furthermore, that the sort of FOPD which might be known just like the independent within the you to definitely class tends to be found in almost every other classifications regarding assortment of much more broadly discussed form of FOPD ( Ochsmann, 1993 29. Ochsmann , Roentgen . ( 1993 ). Angst vor tod und auch sterben. Beitrage zur thanato-psychologie. [concern with dying and you will dying. Efforts to thanatopsychology ] . Gottingen : Hogrefe . ). For example observations strongly recommend an effective hierarchical design of your FOPD.
And there is inaccuracies regarding literary works into the definition and you may construction of the FOPD, the goal of the present study was to take a look at it when you look at the a nuanced means, on the Furcht vor Tod und Sterben Fragebogen (Passing and you may Dying Anxiety Inventory, FVTS) once the an empirical illustration. A whole lot more particularly, we hypothesised one (a) the inconsistencies and inconsistent contributes to past browse was in fact because of the presence of the overall fear of dying basis, which could be meaningfully differentiated for the specific kinds of the fresh FOPD; and you will (b) the latest FOPD manage turn out to possess a beneficial hierarchical structure. To evaluate if the design of the FVTS comprised the overall anxiety about demise plus far more specific kinds of FOPD, i performed good bi-foundation confirmatory basis studies. To check on whether or not the framework of your FOPD was hierarchical in characteristics, i ran some exploratory structural equation activities due to the fact advised for the Goldberg’s (2006) 13. Goldberg , L. R . ( 2006 ). Doing it all bass-ackwards: The development of the brand new hierarchical foundation formations on the best down . Journal of Browse within the Identification , 40 , 347 – 358 . . top-off process.
Participants and techniques
The study was conducted in central, eastern and southern Poland on a group of 1217 people (602 women and 615 men) between 18 and 89 years of age ( M Decades = ; SD Age = ). The sample consisted of people in the following age ranges: between 18 and 23 years old ( M Age = ; SD Age = 1.79), constituting 35%; between 24 and 40 years old ( M Age = ; SD Age = 4.98), constituting 38%; between 41 and 59 years old ( M Age = ; SD Age = 4.95), constituting 16%; and over 60 years old ( M Age = ; SD Age = 5.74), constituting 3%. There was no data on age for 8% of the sample. Twenty-nine per cent of participants had a secondary education, 23% had an elementary education (17% of them were secondary school students) and 23% had a higher education. We did not obtain information on 25% of the participants’ education level.