In the field of mythology otherwise distortions off intimate love, this new ANOVA calculated having intervention acquire scores implies F(1, 69) = , p 2 =.384 and you may IC ninety% more than ? 2 between .233 and you can .499. Profile dos reveals the fresh suggest pre-test and post-try results.
Pre (during the ebony) and you will Blog post (inside the light grey) Opportinity for the latest Control and Input Groups when you look at the Romantic Like Mythology (trust durations from 95%).
The result towards ambivalence, mentioned from the AMI, is comparable. There can be a life threatening impression regarding the expected direction following intervention: Pillai’s trace .211 to have F(six, 64) = dos.852, p = .016, ? 2 = .21. Once comparison joint value, i carried out pursue-right up ANOVAs for every of one’s six details. The outcomes (Shape step 3) suggest analytical advantages having a giant perception proportions within these dimensions: paternal resentment, F(step 1, 69) = 4.605, p = .035, ? dos = .063, IC ninety% to have ? dos = .002 to .170, and complementary gender differences, both aggressive, F(1, 69) = , p 2 = .182, IC ninety% getting ? 2 = .062 to help you .309 and you may benevolent, F(step 1, 69) = 4.69, p = .034, ? 2 =.064, IC ninety% over ? dos = .003 to .171.
Pre (into the grey) and you may Article (inside the white) Way for brand new Manage and you may Intervention Organizations on the Aggressive and you can Benevolent Prejudices towards boys Proportions (depend on durations out of 95%).
For the new acceptability of your application, 68.6% out of profiles chose the viewpoints option “It’s revealed myself almost every other perspectives”, with twenty-two.9% which felt Liad@s had helped these to become more mature about them and made him or her attempt to boost. Merely 8.6% (3 users) told you it hadn’t produced him or her replace the means it believe and/or means it associated with anybody else.
Therefore, the outcomes suggest that pupils and you can teens ilies and sheltered for the domestic land due to their welfare and you can coverage have difficulties within affective and you can maturational invention one to fade the ability to present fit future relationships, which makes them a prone high-chance class (Anderson, 2014; Evans mais aussi al
Immediately following deciding the potency of new input toward about three target issue, subservient analyses was in fact accomplished, demonstrating that the results for the three groups of variables was sugar sugar dating site indeed unrelated toward intercourse changeable. Using MAbivalence) or ANOVA (towards mythology changeable) and you may adding the newest sex adjustable indicated that neither the end result out of sex nor the result of the interaction with therapy was significant (p > .05 for everybody testing). 353, p = .038) and you will a poor and you may marginally tall connection with paternal resentment (-.319, p = .062).
About your connection between your advantages of the newest input and years, only one or two points or objectives is relevant: there’s a significant negative experience of intense sexism (-
While we couldn’t perform logical mathematical review that have data gotten to own kids for the setup except that RCC, brand new many our very own people found large levels of sexism and you will misbeliefs on like inside the teens institutionalized inside RCC than those receive in other training conducted from inside the a low-institutionalized adolescent society away from similar years (De- los angeles Pena ainsi que al., 2011; Nava-Reyes, Rojas-Solis, Amador, & Quintero, 2018). , 2014).
In spite of the reported significance of help in this place certainly one of high-risk organizations, up until now there was nothing replicable lookup certain to help you TDV treatments towards RCC populace. In connection with this, this research brings clear proof regarding functionality from good psychoeducational input in line with the use of a cellular telephone application so you’re able to get rid of perceptions and you will philosophy associated with TDV when you look at the adolescence: sexism, myths away from personal love, and you can ambivalence and you may prejudices into the males.